Owner of $15m property fined for cutting trees that blocked view of sea

The trees were 80-100 years old.

Advertisement

When council staff spoke to Fallwell, he said he had contacted the owners of a couple of neighbouring properties to discuss the pruning and they didn’t object.

Advertisement

The council had to get a court production order to find out who Fallwell had paid to cut the trees. The contractor, who was paid $6000 by Fallwell, was also charged by the council.

Advertisement

Fallwell later changed his story to say he had the trees cut because they were obstructing his view of the beach and sea.

Advertisement

The pōhutukawa on Fallwell’s property is listed as a notable tree in the Auckland Plan, and the other one was protected due to its height and proximity to the beach. That means resource consent is required before any alteration or trimming of the trees can occur.

Advertisement

He appeared in the Auckland District Court in December.

Advertisement

The council told Judge Sheena Tepania that notable trees are among the most significant trees in Tāmaki Makaurau and had been specifically identified due to their historical, cultural and environmental value and to ensure that the benefits they provide are retained for future generations.

Advertisement

The council said the pruning had negatively affected the health and stability of the two trees. About 20% of the canopy cover of the tree on Fallwell’s property had been removed, meaning its health may decline. It will take decades for the canopy to fill in again.

Advertisement

Both trees were highly visible, the council said, and the pruning meant houses were more visible from the beach, resulting in a loss of amenity value of the Takapuna beachfront.

Advertisement

The council argued that Fallwell was culpable of gross carelessness or gross recklessness, and he should have checked if the trees were protected before having them cut.

Advertisement

Judge Tepania doubted Fallwell was unaware that the trees were protected as his family had owned the property for nearly 40 years, and she said he could have easily informed himself of the trees’ status.

Advertisement

“It is a reasonable expectation that persons who seek to have work carried out on indigenous trees of such an age, 80-100 years old, will demonstrate prudence in their actions and undertake the necessary checks with council. A simple phone call inquiry to council is not an unreasonable expectation when dealing with trees of such significant value,” the judge said in her decision released this month.

Advertisement

Fallwell’s offending was highly careless, she said. He failed to make a simple inquiry of council regarding the work, was motivated by his desire to enhance his views of the beach and sea, and showed poor judgment by failing to obtain the permission of all the landowners in relation to the pōhutukawa on the accessway.

Advertisement

Judge Tepania noted Fallwell was remorseful, and that he was a person of good character and pleaded guilty early.

Advertisement

He was convicted and fined $21,000. Ninety per cent of the fine will be paid to the council.

Advertisement

Fallwell’s 1604m² property has a council valuation of $15.7m.

Advertisement

The contractor was also charged and will be sentenced in May.

Advertisement

“Where there is evidence to support a prosecution, we will look to prosecute in most cases where remediation is not possible and infringement penalties available do not reflect the scale of offending,” he said.

Advertisement

Fallwell could not be reached for comment.

Advertisement