In today’s world, we witness a sudden surge in conflicts, skirmishes, and civil unrest occurring across every corner of the globe. These disruptions are not limited to conflicts between nations; but also playing out within countries and citizens standing up against their own governments. From protests and civil disobedience to political instability and open warfare, the global atmosphere is becoming increasingly unpredictable, volatile, and fraught with tension. People everywhere are feeling a growing sense of insecurity, worrying not only about their own safety, but also the safety of their families and the stability of their livelihoods. The foundations that once provided a sense of normalcy and assurance now seem shaken, leaving people uncertain about what the future holds.
A significant turning point in this global instability is the onset of the tariff war that was initiated by the U.S. President Donald Trump. His protectionist policies and erratic decision-making has sent shockwaves through international markets, disrupting trades, damaging diplomatic relationships, and contributing to a broader sense of economic turmoil. The ripple effects of these actions have been far-reaching, triggering downturns in several major economies and intensifying fears of a global recession. As economic and political systems struggle to adapt to these challenges, the world appears to be entering a new era—one where the fight for survival and security is more apparent than ever. The competition for resources, jobs, and political influence has become fiercer, and many are left grappling with the reality that the old rules no longer apply. In this climate of uncertainty, resilience and adaptability may become the most critical tools for individuals and nations alike.
In all the scenarios mentioned above, one striking commonality stands out: all these ongoing struggles are happening for supremacy. Whether it’s individuals, organizations, political leaderships, or entire nations—everyone seems driven by a desire to assert dominance over others. There’s a growing unwillingness to compromise or acknowledge truth, even when it serves the greater good or benefits the community at large. This trend is particularly evident in India, after Prime Minister Narendra Modi secured a third consecutive term in power, despite relentless efforts by all opposition parties to disrepute his government. Throughout the election period, numerous falsehoods and misinformation campaigns were spread by certain political factions, many of which were later found being supported by external anti-India forces. Yet, these efforts failed to sway the electorate. What’s even more worrying is the current tendency of these forces to challenge every law passed by Parliament in the Supreme Court, which increasingly appears to be acting in a manner that suggests alignment with anti-government narratives. In the Apex court nearly 80,000 cases remain pending for many years, yet the Apex Court is always unusually prompt when it comes to hearing petitions filed against the Modi government decisions.
This trend has been ongoing ever since Narendra Modi assumed office over a decade ago, and it has gradually sparked significant public dissent against the top court. It also raises serious concerns about the legitimacy of the highest democratic institution—the Parliament. When every law passed by a duly elected Parliament is consistently challenged in the Apex Court, it undermines the authority of the legislature and blurs the lines between the judiciary and legislative branches. Such actions suggest an overreach by the judiciary, stepping beyond its constitutional boundaries and interfering in matters meant for lawmakers. There is a growing need to clearly define the limits of judicial intervention—when it is appropriate for the courts to step in, and when they must respectfully refrain from encroaching upon the domain of the legislature. Ironically, this overreach is coming from a judiciary that resists any governmental role even in the appointment of judges. India is the only country in the world where judges appoint their own successors, who are normally from within a close-knit circle usually their own family members. This practice only adds to the perception of a lack of transparency and accountability within the judicial system.
Its time Modi government to demolish this unholy nexus of anti-India forces be it in politics, bureaucracy, or in judiciary before these powers succeed in destroying the basic democratic fabric of the country. -Yugal Parashar